Clinical impact of prophylactic clip closure of mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

نویسندگان

  • Hideaki Harada
  • Satoshi Suehiro
  • Daisuke Murakami
  • Ryotaro Nakahara
  • Tetsuro Ujihara
  • Takanori Shimizu
  • Yasunaga Miyama
  • Yasushi Katsuyama
  • Kenji Hayasaka
  • Shigetaka Tounou
چکیده

Background and study aims  Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is useful for en bloc resection of superficial colorectal neoplasms to ensure accurate histologic diagnoses. However, colorectal ESD is associated with a high frequency of adverse events (AEs). We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of prophylactic clip closure (PCC) of mucosal defects for AEs after colorectal ESD. Patients and methods  This study included 197 patients with 211 lesions who underwent colorectal ESD between June 2010 and August 2016. Patients who had delayed perforation, delayed bleeding, abdominal pain, or fever were defined as AEs after colorectal ESD. Complete PCC was defined as completely sutured mucosal defect using endoclips following colorectal ESD, whereas incomplete PCC was defined as the mucosal defects that did not enable PCC or were partially sutured. Clinical records were retrospectively reviewed and clinical outcomes evaluated. Results AEs occurred in 29 lesions (13.7 %), including 12 with delayed bleeding, 12 with fever, 2 with abdominal pain, 2 with fever and abdominal pain, and 1 with delayed bleeding and fever. Delayed perforation was not observed in any patient. The frequency of AEs was significantly lower in the group with complete PCC than in the group with incomplete PCC (7.3 % [9/123] vs. 22.7 % [20/88]; P  < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that AEs after colorectal ESD were significantly associated with tumor size and submucosal fibrosis. Subgroup analysis among the resected specimen size of < 40 mm revealed that there was no significant difference in AEs between the 2 groups (5.6 % [6/107] vs. 17.8 % [8/45]; P  = 0.069). However, the frequency of fever with complete PCC was significantly lower than that with incomplete PCC (2.8 % [3/107] vs. 13.3 % [6/45]; P  = 0.020). Conclusions Tumor size and submucosal fibrosis were independent risk factors for AEs after colorectal ESD. PCC may be effective in minimizing AEs after colorectal ESD, especially the frequency of fever.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The efficacy and safety of prophylactic closure for a large mucosal defect after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is not a common treatment for colorectal neoplasms because of its technical difficulties and has a higher incidence of complication. In particular, perforation is one of the severe complications and these patients require surgical intervention. However, whether prophylactic closure after colorectal ESD prevents perforation and other complications is not kn...

متن کامل

Technical feasibility of line-assisted complete closure technique for large mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Background and study aims Complete closure of large mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD) is considered impossible in most cases because of the limited width of the open clip. We therefore invented a simple closure technique using clip-and-line, named "line-assisted complete closure (LACC)", and assessed its technical feasibility. Patients and methods Between...

متن کامل

Endoscopic mucosa-submucosal clip closure method.

It is desirable to perform a prophylactic closure using endoclips in patients who are at high risk of delayed bleeding or perforation after endoscopic resection [1]. A mucosal defect after endoscopic mucosal resection can be closed with sequential endoclips as if zipping up the mucosal edges. However, it is difficult to close a large mucosal defect after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) u...

متن کامل

Line-assisted complete closure of duodenal mucosal defects after underwater endoscopic mucosal resection.

Duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) carries a high risk of adverse events, including delayed perforation [1, 2]. Because complete clip closure of mucosal defects can reportedly prevent post-procedural adverse events in the colorectum, we established a line-assisted complete closure (LACC) technique for large mucosal defects after colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection [3]. LACC can be...

متن کامل

Endoscopic double-layered suturing: a novel technique for closure of large mucosal defects after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are widely accepted treatments for early colorectal neoplasms, but complications such as bleeding or perforation are often encountered, especially when the lesions being resected are large in size [1,2]. The closure of the mucosal defect reduces the risk of these complications [3,4]. Here, we report an effective techn...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017